Accessibility, made actionable

Turn accessibility findings into verified fixes.

We test the journeys your users and buyers depend on, repair barriers at the source, and leave your team with retested evidence, not a scanner dump or a magic-widget promise.

  • Keyboard + screen reader
  • Source-level remediation
  • Criterion-level retesting

Built for teams whose digital products serve the public.

Government-facing SaaS State & local organizations HHS-funded care Digital agencies

The evidence loop

Measure the barrier.
Close the loop.

Automation gives breadth. Human testing finds meaning, interaction, and context. Engineering changes the experience. Retesting proves whether it improved.

  1. 01

    Scope real journeys

    Choose representative pages, shared components, and tasks such as apply, pay, book, enroll, or submit.

  2. 02

    Test beyond the scan

    Combine automated coverage with keyboard, zoom and reflow, semantics, and targeted assistive-technology review.

  3. 03

    Repair at the source

    Turn evidence into prioritized, developer-ready changes across code, content, documents, and third-party flows.

  4. 04

    Retest and document

    Record outcomes, remaining limitations, ownership, and safeguards that reduce regression risk after release.

Engagement path

Start with the journey.
Scale with evidence.

One accountable path from diagnosis through implementation, with scope and limitations stated plainly.

Implement

Remediation & rebuilds

Fix defined barriers in the existing product, or rebuild when architecture, design-system, or CMS debt makes repair uneconomic.

Scope the repair

Sustain

Accessibility operations

Scheduled automated checks, sampled manual regression testing, release support, training, and issue-aging reports.

Plan ongoing coverage

Document

ACR, VPAT & content support

Evidence for procurement disclosures, plus remediation and QA for PDFs and forms. A completed VPAT is an ACR, not a certification.

Discuss the evidence

Current US context

A practical standard.
Precise claims.

We use WCAG 2.2 AA as a forward-looking engineering target where appropriate, while testing and reporting against the version actually named by the applicable rule or contract.

ADA Title II

Current compliance date for public entities serving 50,000 or more people. Every special district government uses the 2028 date, regardless of population.

HHS Section 504

Current compliance date for covered recipients of HHS financial assistance with 15 or more employees.

Smaller entities

Later dates apply to smaller covered entities and, under Title II, all special district governments. Coverage and exceptions remain fact-specific.

Plain-language primer

What "ADA/WCAG 2.1 AA" actually means.

Both federal rules driving current deadlines point to the same technical standard. Here is what it covers, and what it does not.

The standard the rules actually name

DOJ's ADA Title II rule (28 CFR part 35) and HHS's Section 504 rule (45 CFR part 84) both incorporate the Level A and Level AA success criteria of the static June 2018 version of WCAG 2.1 — not 2.2. We test and report against the version your rule or contract actually names, and treat WCAG 2.2 AA as a forward-looking engineering target, not a claim of legal compliance.

Neither rule requires a specific vendor, scanner, or overlay widget. They require that the experience itself — the markup, focus order, labels, contrast, and structure — meets the named success criteria.

Who the current federal dates cover

  • Apr 26, 2027 — ADA Title II public entities (other than special districts) with population 50,000 or more.
  • Apr 26, 2028 — ADA Title II entities under 50,000 population, and all special district governments regardless of size.
  • May 11, 2027 — HHS Section 504 recipients of HHS financial assistance with 15 or more employees.
  • May 10, 2028 — HHS Section 504 recipients with fewer than 15 employees.

Dates reflect the 2026 interim final rules that extended both original compliance dates by one year. Existing nondiscrimination and effective-communication duties continue during the extension. This is general information, not legal advice; confirm applicability with qualified counsel.

What shows up in almost every audit

Seven violations we find most often

  1. Missing or non-descriptive alt text — meaningful images and icons with no text alternative, or a redundant one.
  2. Insufficient color contrast — body copy, placeholder text, or disabled-looking controls below the 4.5:1 (text) / 3:1 (large text, UI components) AA thresholds.
  3. Keyboard traps and invisible focus — a removed focus outline with no visible replacement, or a focus order that skips controls entirely.
  4. Unlabeled form fields — placeholder text standing in for a real, programmatically associated label.
  5. Non-descriptive link and button text — "click here" or "read more" that means nothing out of context to a screen-reader user browsing by link list.
  6. Heading structure used for visual styling — skipped or decorative heading levels that break the page outline assistive technology relies on.
  7. Inaccessible PDFs and documents — scanned images with no OCR text layer, missing tags, or a reading order that does not match the visual layout.

Ungated field guide

The procurement-ready accessibility checklist.

Use this before an RFP, renewal, redesign, or ACR request. Read it free, right here, no email required.

Prefer a formatted, shareable PDF? Get it free below

Readiness / 06 questions

  1. 01

    Which standard and version is named? Capture the law, contract, RFP, or customer requirement rather than assuming.

  2. 02

    Which complete journeys matter most? Include authentication, payment, forms, documents, and third-party handoffs.

  3. 03

    Can keyboard and assistive-technology users finish them? A clean automated score cannot answer this.

  4. 04

    Who can change the source? Name owners for code, content, PDFs, design systems, and vendors.

  5. 05

    Is every claim backed by dated evidence? Record versions, environments, methods, defects, and limitations.

  6. 06

    How will fixes be retested? Define acceptance criteria and preserve before-and-after evidence.

Free tools and downloads

Take something useful.
Talk to us if it's a fit.

Real documents, not a lead-gen trick. Enter a work email and the file downloads immediately — we store the email so a human can follow up, nothing more.

Fastest next step

Get a free 5-minute audit of one page.

Send a URL and a work email. We will run it through automated checks and follow up with the three most consequential issues we can see — no sales call required to get the results.

Free · email required

ADA/WCAG Readiness Checklist

The same six questions as above, formatted as a printable PDF you can circulate internally or attach to an RFP response.

Free · email required

Sample Audit Report Excerpt

Three real-format findings — observed, impact, repair, retest — so you can see exactly what a Priority Journey Review delivers before you buy one.

Free · email required

Remediation Quick-Start Guide

A realistic two-week first sprint for turning an existing findings list into shipped, retested fixes.

Premium · $49

DOJ Title II & HHS 504 Playbook

The full deadline, coverage, and exceptions breakdown for both federal rules — built for briefing leadership or scoping procurement.

Packages & ranges

Scoped by page count.
Priced as a range.

Every engagement is scoped on a short call before we quote a fixed number. These ranges show where comparable work has landed.

Landing (1 page)

Single-page audit

WCAG 2.1 AA audit of one landing page, findings report in evidence-card format, a prioritized fix list, and one re-test round after fixes ship.

Typical range $500-$1,500

Scope this page

Website (3 pages)

Core-journey audit

Audit of up to 3 key pages — for example home, contact, and a form or checkout — a consolidated report, risk-based prioritization, and a 30-minute consult.

Typical range $1,500-$3,500

Scope 3 pages

Corporate site (10+ pages)

Full-site audit & roadmap

Full site audit — automated scan plus manual review of key flows like navigation, forms, and media — a detailed remediation roadmap, a VPAT/ACR document, and support for your dev team.

Typical range $5,000-$15,000+

Scope a full site

Standalone product

Compliance audit only

A formal audit-only report with no follow-up remediation — sized to meet a compliance deadline (Title II / Section 504) and sellable on its own.

Typical range $2,000-$7,500

Scope a compliance audit

Ongoing

Retainer

Monthly monitoring plus re-checks after each release, for sites and products that ship often.

Typical range $500-$2,000 /month

Discuss a retainer

These are indicative ranges based on comparable engagements, not a quote — final pricing is scoped to your page count, flow complexity, and deadline after a short call. This page is general information, not legal advice, and no engagement guarantees a specific compliance outcome.

See it, don't just read it

A compliant page,
working in your browser.

Turn on WCAG mode in the header, then try the panel below — every control here is a real, keyboard-operable element, not a screenshot.

Before

What we usually find

  • Placeholder text standing in for a real label
  • ~3.2:1 text contrast — below the 4.5:1 AA minimum
  • Link text with no destination context
  • Focus indicator removed from the button

After

What we ship

  • Real, programmatically associated label
  • 7:1+ text contrast on body copy
  • Link text that means something out of context
  • Tab to the button — the focus ring is real, try it

Try it yourself · 3 live controls

Text adaptation

Resize and re-space this passage — the same kind of control WCAG mode applies site-wide.

Public entities must test the journeys people actually rely on — not just run a scanner and call it done.

Audio on text

Have the browser read the same passage aloud, using your device's speech engine.

Colorblind-friendly view

Status should never rely on color alone. Toggle to see the fix.

  • Pass
  • Needs review
  • Fail

Fit call

Bring one journey.
Leave with a clear next step.

Tell us what is driving the work. We will use the call to determine whether a focused review, remediation sprint, rebuild, or another specialist is the honest fit.

This fit-call form has no connected inbox yet: it prepares a copyable inquiry summary instead of sending it. The downloads above, the audit request, and the newsletter signup are different — those do submit to a real backend and are stored.